Thursday, July 09, 2015

Bolivia: Who votes for these leaders?.




Tags: Bolivia and Evo Morales  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

Obama's strategy: Let the next president deal with it

A couple of days ago, President Obama went over to the Pentagon, gave a little chat, but said very little, as reported by Dana Milbank:
"Obama did provide the outlines of a comprehensive strategy against the Islamic State. He acknowledged that there can be no solution without a new government in Syria, minus President Bashar al-Assad. He spoke of more support for anti-Islamic State forces. He spoke about the group's threat metastasizing beyond the region.   
But he said little about what he'll do, specifically."
Here is the short version: Obama does not want to get involved and will do air strikes until he flies home to Chicago in 2017.   
The bad news is that Obama's detachment is utterly irresponsible, especially if you agree that ISIS is a threat to the U.S.
The good news for President Obama, and most Democrats, is that the country is not interested in any kind of involvement.  
So he wins politically, but our national security suffers.  

Last, but not least, the Obama "don't bother me with anything serious" presidency may not get so lucky, especially in Syria, as reported by The Washington Post:

IN MAY 2014, President Obama promised a new U.S. effort to train and equip moderate Syrian rebel forces. The next month, the administration asked Congress for $500 million to fund the effort, with the aim of deploying 5,000 U.S.-backed fighters a year for three years. Numerous analysts quickly pointed out two big flaws in the plan: The new force was too small to make a significant difference on Syria’s multi-sided battlefield, and the administration was hamstringing it by insisting that it target only the Islamic State and not the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. As so often in his handling of Syria, Mr. Obama dismissed proposals for a more robust approach.
Now, once again, the president is reaping the consequences of his half-measures. On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter reported the pitiful result of the training program: After a year, he told the Senate Armed Services Committee, just 60 Syrians were enlisted. Meanwhile, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified that Israel and Jordan “very much believe [in] the possibility” that the Assad regime could soon collapse, touching off “a foot race” of al-Qaeda and Islamic State forces “converging on Damascus.”
Since the United States has failed to train or support a moderate Syrian force capable of countering the extremists, it has no ready way to prevent that disaster. 
The fall of Damascus?  That would be serious!
There are a couple of things that I want to add:  
1) I can understand that the public is tired and wants to stay away from the Middle East.  My guess is that today's attitudes about the Middle East are similar to the isolationist mood of the late 1930s, when most Americans did not want to get involved in "their war over there."
2) Presidents lead by explaining to voters why it matters to get involved. 
President Obama has avoided that kind of preparation of the public for the coming fight.  He has never gone on TV and explained in detailed why Islamic "forces converging on Damascus" matters a great deal.
So here we are.  Our "don't waste my time 'cause I'm going on vacation" president kicks the can forward.  The next guy won't have a place to kick the can to!
P. S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.





Tags: ISIS strategy and President Obama  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

A look at US-Cuba talks with Jerry Brewer and Pedro Riera-Escalante

"Pedro Riera Escalante served the Castro regime as part of Cuban intelligence for nearly 24 years (1969-1993); in Mexico City, under the guise of a diplomat, from 1986-1991. Riera was the Group Chief of Section Q-1, in charge of operations against the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
He was placed there, at the highest level of Fidel Castro’s government, via the head of the General Directorate of Intelligence, or DGI (today Directorate of Intelligence, DI), General of Division Luis Barreiro Carames; and after a proposal by Brigadier General Matos Ezequiel Suarez, 2nd Chief of Intelligence for foreign counterintelligence.
Riera told this interviewer: “I was sent to develop and implement the same methodology that was developed for the recruitment of CIA officers, which had been approved as the official doctrine for (Soviet/Cuban) Intelligence.”
Riera eventually denounced the Fidel Castro dictatorship and was imprisoned. He called for a shift towards respect for human rights and democracy, before, during and after his sentence to prison in Cuba. His revelations of his orders from Cuba, and his actions in the secret war that has pitted Cuba versus the U.S. for decades in intelligence and espionage tradecraft, reveal a continuing process of Cuban subversion in this hemisphere.
Brewer: “What was the mission and importance of the Cuban DGI intelligence service during the period of your service?”
Pedro Riera Escalante (PRE): “The first priority of the DGI, from 1969 through 1993, was penetration and opposition to the United States government and the CIA.
“In my opinion it continues right now. The United States was always considered the main enemy, and the policy of Fidel Castro was to maintain, at all costs, the confrontation and to prevent normalization of relations, this insofar as having a powerful foreign enemy served Castro to justify his economic failures and his foreign policy of supporting guerrilla movements in other countries.
“At one of the previous times, when they were close to the resumption of relations with Cuba, during the administration of Gerald Ford, Castro in late 1975 broke off [talks] due to the Cuban military intervention in Angola. In 1977, with the entry of Cuban troops in Ethiopia, again the process that was developing with Jimmy Carter ground to a halt. During the Reagan administration Cuba's military expansion accelerated in Angola, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, and El Salvador.
“The facts prove that during most of the years since 1959 the policy of Cuban military intervention in different parts of the world has been the principal obstacle for the normalization of relations between the two countries.
“Now, thanks to President Obama closing his eyes to Cuban intervention in Venezuela and internal repression against democratic opponents and dissidents in Cuba, what has been conceded completely is that the United States has accomplished the restoration of diplomatic relations.
“In all those years the mission of the DGI, until 1968, was to train [and] support guerrillas and urban guerrilla movements materially and politically in most countries where they existed.
"From 1968 to 1975, the Department of National Liberation was separated from the DGI [and] charged with support to guerrillas in different parts of the world, under the command of Comandante Manuel Piñeiro.
“The missions of the DGI, with respect to the United States from 1969 to 1989, were developed by three sub-leaderships … and military intelligence, they being charged with penetrating the United States government, first the State Department, embassies, universities, media, [and] diplomatic mediums in Washington and New York. In 1985, it may have been (Cuba's military intelligence) that recruited the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency official, Ana Belen Montes.
“[Two DGI] sectional departments, Q-1 and Q-2, [were] in charge of work against the CIA. The first with three directorates, subdivided into sections: penetration of CIA headquarters by infiltration or the introduction of agents recruited at universities and directed to join the CIA; penetration in third countries; [and] harassment operations dedicated to propaganda and psychological war against the CIA, therein a fundamental pillar was the former CIA officer and Cuban intelligence agent Philip Agee, who died in 2008.
“There were also other former officers, like John Stockwell, the ex-chief of station of the CIA in Angola during the war; [and] Phil Roettinger, a CIA officer who played an important role in Guatemala in 1954, who died in 2002.
“Following instructions from Cuba’s leadership, I contacted Phil Roettinger during my time in Mexico approximately between the years 1988-1990, and traveled to the city of San Miguel de Allende and visited him at home in order to coordinate his activities and a trip to Cuba with a group of senior officials of the CIA and the armed forces, supporters of improving relations with Cuba.
Since the 80s the DGI had two important programs to influence government policy of the United States towards Cuba. (…) The Section responsible for the United States was directed to contact, recruit and use State Department officials, journalists and prominent personalities in different mediums in order to exert influence actions on the United States government in favor of improving relations with Cuba.
"Moreover, Section Q-1 was in charge of harassment [and] directed to denounce CIA plans and reveal the identity of CIA officers through the actions of Philip Agee and his publication Covert Action and a group of disgruntled CIA officers who travelled to Cuba and took action or did publications favorable to the interests of Cuban Intelligence.
"[Several] wrote books revealing information, means and methods of the CIA, violating their contracts with the CIA, which were used in some manner by Philip Agee or the DGI, directly or indirectly, consciously or unconsciously.
"I attended to Philip Agee in Cuba during the years 1974 and 1975, to advise and support him in developing his book ‘Inside the Company: CIA Diary,’ and later I contacted him in late 1989 when his book became the centerpiece of the ‘Moncada’ operation, aimed at recruiting the secretary of the CIA's deputy chief of station [in Mexico City]. [Information from that first contact] revealed data on the most important counterintelligence operation carried out by the Station in order to recruit a Cuban intelligence officer; the facts I knew subsequently allowed me to verify that the information was true and the operation continued, and finally allowed intelligence heads to take preventive measures with the implicated Cuban intelligence officers.
"Double agent Donato Poveda located in the Office of Merchant Marines in Tokyo in 1974-1976 provide misinformation to the CIA on troops and military equipment being transported on Cuban civilian ships into battle in the war in Angola.”
BREWER: “How much of this was the doctrine of Russia and their collaboration?”
PRE: “They developed and initiated special espionage tradecraft and operations for Cuban officials with access to information from interests of the CIA located in Cuban missions abroad that were directed so that the CIA would recruit [them] to misinform, know their means and methods, and study and engage officers that they attended in order to recruit them. In early 1976 I received the task to draft the first tradecraft methodology for the DGI, for which I was provided records of all tradecraft developed empirically or with basic past concepts; advice from the KGB was an important leg-up in the work, we considered Soviet Intelligence our teachers.
"Colonel Victor, Section Chief of tradecraft of the KGB, along with Colonel Pavel Yatzcov, lectured me several times on Soviet methodology…. From the notes I took during these conferences, and analyses of the four most important [operations] developed to that date by Cuban intelligence, in Japan, Spain and Mexico. I compiled the first methodology. “The first two successes of the new methodology were the projections and recruiting so that the CIA would recruit [two] agents.
The CIA harassment work developed with Philip Agee was prepared in coordination and with the support of the KGB.”
BREWER: “What do you think of the mutual opening of embassies between Cuba and the U.S.?”
PRE: “First of all, the reciprocal opening of embassies benefits the Cuban government and hurts the Cuban people's struggle for the democratization of the country. It can benefit U.S. sectors and entrepreneurs interested in the Cuban market. But by no means is this opening and the development of tourism going to produce an impact that helps the democratization of the country, insofar as what the government has done has been to intensify repression, which is going to increase its income and strengthen it in order to be able to repress better.
"And I want to point out that this statement is made not because I believe the embargo should continue, and that relations should not be normalized. I have always been in favor of these, but with conditions that guarantee the Cuban people will truly benefit and on a base of real democratic opening and not one of trickery.
"Fidel Castro and Raul have said in years past that, when the hostile policy of the United States would end and relations normalized, the relationship could bring about openings in Cuba, but none of this has happened. To the contrary, repression has intensified, they have changed their ways of great trials and convictions to brief detentions, but all of the repressive system continues intact and will be strengthened in order to have total control over the new North American diplomats that arrive in the country.”
BREWER: “Do you think that Cuban espionage will proliferate in the US with their new embassy on U.S. soil?”
PRE: "As is known, espionage is a state policy, and it will continue, they might be more careful, but it will be perfected.
"Moreover, in recent years the degree of penetration of Cuban intelligence within the US government is very high. As well, I am convinced that after years the fruits of dozens of agents who were recruited while studying at universities in order to later penetrate the CIA and the State Department must have harvested fruits. When I contacted the CIA in Mexico in 1999 and 2000, to seek political asylum, the CIA counterintelligence officials were convinced that they had a spy within the CIA and it was not the case of Ana Belen Montes in the Defense Intelligence Agency.
"My opinion is that Ana Belen Montes was used in a very risky way, putting her life at risk in order to exert favorable influence towards Cuba's in the US government, but Ana Belen did not belong to the CIA.
"All those agents within the US government and the CIA should have provided valuable information so that Raul Castro would have firsthand information and impose his principles in the negotiations with Obama."
BREWER: “Do you think Cuba will end/curtail surveillance/monitoring of the new US embassy in Cuba?"
PRE: “Of course the current monitoring will be increased. All Cuban personnel now working in the Interests Section work for Cuban State Security. All housing for officials may have microphones and other devices installed. All records of refugees that have been and are being processed are first reviewed by Cuban personnel who are security agents that [give] detailed information to officials.”
BREWER: “Is Cuba's mission in Venezuela a threat to the US and Venezuela, and other democracies in the Americas?”
PRE: “The Government of Venezuela is acting in full coordination with the Cuban government. Its repressive bodies and armed forces are under the control of Cuban officials. Venezuela is not a danger to the United States today, but it could become one; in these times it is a government in a situation that poses a danger for having brought the nation's economy to crisis, and it is losing more popular support on a daily basis.
"They have established a very effective repressive system to weaken the opposition and impede them from reaching government office. Castro will guarantee oil and revenue in Venezuelan dollars at all costs; supporting these with all his intelligence resources in order to keep President [Nicolas] Maduro in power, or the generals who remain loyal to Castro in case of crisis.
"The danger to the United States is how far will it allow the Cuban government and Cuban intelligence in Venezuela to continue giving orders to repress its people; in this lies the danger. As well, how far will Maduro go in his military alliance with Russia?"
BREWER: “Any comments or warnings to the U.S. on this diplomatic interaction between the U.S. and Cuba?”
PRE: “The image and foreign policy of the United States have apparently improved, with President Obama defining his new policy of establishing relations and rejecting the politics of aggression and pressure that were ineffective; and his position against the embargo.
"Obama has acted in accordance with Castro and his interests, but against the legitimate interests of the Cuban people, the facts will demonstrate that the Castro regime will not stay in power forever, and in the present and future it will show that this regime will not change its dictatorial essence as long as the Castro brothers are in power, even while the United States has changed its policy and even eliminated the embargo.
"Obama, apparently, must have been tranquilized by Raul Castro's promise that he will not continue to rule when his current mandate ends, but he will guarantee that his may persist even after, like what happened in China after the death of Mao; and with normal relations with the US, the struggle of the Cuban people for freedom and democracy will be more repressed, difficult and painful.
"I am confident that the US Congress will make the best decisions, so that the embargo will be lifted only after Raul Castro eliminates the embargo on the rights and freedoms of the Cuban people. The embargo was unproductive and it was an erroneous policy that punished the Cuban people, but after so much time it would be more erroneous and more punishing on the Cuban people to suspend it without Raul Castro making a real democratic opening in Cuba."
It is interesting to hear Sr Rivera say that "Obama has acted in accordance with Castro and his interests".
We spoke with Jerry Brewer on Wednesday:

Check Out Politics Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with Silvio Canto Jr on BlogTalkRadio

Tags: US-Cuba talks 2015  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and “The Merchant of Venice”?

It is more than crazy.   It is insulting crazy.    According to news reports, President Fernandez of Argentina made a reference to “The Merchant of Venice”:


“Argentina’s Jewish community is up in arms over President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s comparison of Shakespeare’s Shylock to the investment funds that have bought up the national debt on the cheap.
She made the remarks last week on Twitter, recounting a meeting with 10-year-old schoolchildren. Even though Israeli officials are aware of her comments, Jerusalem has not released a response.
Kirchner said that to understand the country’s economic problems, the children should read Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice,” who is depicted as a vengeful money lender.
This is an outrage.   We are hoping that President Cristina Fernandez will apologize but don’t hold your breadth.
We mentioned this story on Wednesday's show:




Tags: Argentina, The Merchant of Venice  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

US-Cuba, Mexico, Colombia & FARC plus other stories with Jerry Brewer & Fausta Rodriguez




Tags: US-Cuba issues, FARC and Colombia, Mexico police, San Francisco and immigration law,  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR BLOG AND RADIO SHOW

FOLLOW MY BLOG

LISTEN TO OUR RECENT SHOWS

Check Out Politics Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with Silvio Canto Jr on BlogTalkRadio

Search This Blog