Talarico rewriting his border , GOP surprise in Minnesota and "No kings" is back.......
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." - President Ronald Reagan
James Talarico is no Henry Cuellar, the one border Democrat who called out the border mess.
----------------------------
James Talarico has more videos than anyone. You can spend an entire afternoon watching everything that this man has recorded over the years. He has a video explaining how the angel told Mary about the baby.
What we don't have is a video of Talarico standing up to the Biden administration and rejecting their border policy. We have a campaign video saying that, but no video to support what he is claiming.
Glad to see that the Border Patrol Union is not buying it:
The National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) — the union of the U.S. Border Patrol — isn’t fooled. “JAMES TALARICO DOES NOT SUPPORT BORDER SECURITY: Talarico’s false claim that he called out the Biden Administration for failing on the border is nothing more than a #FakeNews political ad,” it posted on October 14.
NBPC continued:
His record shows that he labeled border security funding as “wasting money on dumb things,” and instead supported diverting $800 million in funds away from protecting our borders. He voted AGAINST creating a Border Protection Unit and he has called for “pathways” to citizenship, aka “AMNESTY” for illegal aliens. At least 25 million illegal aliens invaded the US during the 4 years of the disastrous Biden Administration and openly advocating for pathways to citizenship is NOT putting America First and will lead to the destruction of America as we know it.
We CANNOT afford another disaster on our borders!
Glad to see the Border Patrol union punch back. I live here in Texas, and James Talarico is no Henry Cuellar, the one border Democrat who called out the border mess.
Show us the video or a transcript of the speech. We think that you are making that up. Prove us wrong with anything that confirms your position.
P.S. Check out my blog for posts, podcasts and videos.
_02.jpg)
P.S. You can listen to my show. If you like our posts, please look for ”Donate” on the right column of the blog page.
The conduct of the DOJ and media deserves a second look.
-------------------------------
If you are a baby boomer, you remember The Beatles, Henry Aaron hitting #715, and President Nixon resigning over Watergate. It was our soundtrack, as they like to say. It gave us words like "Nixonian" and "The Saturday Night Massacre" and Oval Office tapes. It turned the 37th president into an evil man, and everyone took a shot at him. Even the GOP took down his pictures at the party's convention.
As someone who admired President Nixon, bought and read all of his post presidency books, and volunteered as a student for his 1972 reelection campaign, I do believe that revisiting Watergate is a good idea. Maybe The Washington Post will end up returning that Pulitzer? Don't bet on that, but who knows?
What if Watergate was a hoax, as we say these days? Honestly, after watching Russiagate, the New York trials, and everything else, the idea is not so crazy. I'm not ready to call it a hoax yet, but I'm open to a conversation, as they say these days.
Well, some people think so, such as John D. O'Connor:
Many citizens today, with varied sources of information, understand the highly unethical lawfare waged against President Donald Trump, as exemplified by the Russiagate hoax. By contrast, the more restricted media environment of the early 1970s made prosecutorial misconduct during Watergate harder to scrutinize. With fresh eyes now taking a closer look at the reporting and prosecution of Watergate, it is becoming clear that DOJ investigators should sanction prosecutorial misconduct and set the historical record straight on Richard Nixon’s innocence.
As a refresher, Watergate refers to a political scandal stemming from the June 17, 1972, burglary of the Democratic National Committee’s offices in the Watergate building by burglars with known CIA ties. After two years of investigations, committee inquiries, and trials, over 40 government officials were convicted or jailed, and President Richard Nixon was forced to resign from office.
Recently, former Nixon aide and historian Geoff Shepard presented his case to the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), arguing that the proceedings against Richard Nixon amounted to dishonest, partisan “lawfare” enabled by prosecutorial and Congressional misconduct. Hopefully, the OPR will follow up with a vigorous investigation and clear the record of this unfairly maligned former president.
Clear the record of this unfairly maligned former president? Yes, it's time for a second look at that whole story.
As the article points out:
Why, fifty years later, should we investigate any flaws in Nixon’s prosecution? Because key questions remain: 1) was the prosecution of Nixon and aides (with Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator) so clearly unethical that the OPR should conclude formally that the prosecution was fatally and unethically flawed;
and 2) were the Senate investigation and Majority Watergate Report false in material particulars, constituting a willfully false official Report to the public? In light of the attempted replay of Watergate and the Russiagate hoax, these questions are existential.
Bring it on. Maybe it's time to revisit that whole episode that consumed the country for years. I do recall people back then, such as a neighbor historian, saying that there was a lot of hypocrisy in these attacks against President Nixon. I do believe that the collapse of Vietnam and the betrayal of the Shah of Iran would have turned out differently if President Nixon had been in the Oval Office.
So, let's open up the case and hear more about this.
P.S. Check out my blog for posts, podcasts and videos.


So, here's one for Greta to think about: get a life like a real person.
-----------------------------
Greta Thunberg is back in the news. She has a new cause, a new movement to join, and something to blame Europeans for. Let's catch up with Greta:
Greta Thunberg, the Swedish activist known for her climate alarmism, joined French students protesting school conditions Tuesday, praising their movement as France grapples with weeks of demonstrations and violent clashes.
Thunberg appeared outside a high school near the Paris suburb of Saint-Denis, where students gathered early in the morning with placards and megaphones, chanting slogans. The 23-year-old activist, who first gained recognition for her own school strike over climate change in 2018, said she is there to support the teens protesting their “basic rights.”
“The whole world is watching with awe for these students who are fighting back, reclaiming their future that has been taken away from them,” Thunberg said at the protest. “We are also seeing this spreading across the country and internationally as well — young people looking at this as an example.”
“Many people here, especially the young people, are told ‘Oh, you are just being problematic, you’re just causing trouble, and you don’t really know what you’re doing,’ which are narratives defined by extremely racist media and politicians,” she added. Thunberg said the protestors “don’t need me at all,” but argued that her “privileged” position gave her a duty to support them.
“I am an extremely privileged person. I am a white person from Sweden. I am very much part of this very destructive system that systematically benefits people like me,” she said.
A system that benefits people like her? Really, Greta? Privileged position? Greta has been reading too much about the 1619 Project.
Teens protesting their basic rights? Protesting by injuring 700 police officers? You can't make this up.
"The whole world is watching"? Weren't they chanting that at the 1968 riots during the DNC convention in Chicago? Get a new chant, Greta.
As I understand it, France is facing an "argent" problem, or French for money. That's what I remember from that quick French class that I saw on the internet. No matter what the word is, the problem is that France, like many countries, has to address budget concerns, and bloated education bureaucracies are one place to start. Too many bureaucrats at the main office writing memos and handbooks to justify their existence. France can't afford that anymore, and some cutting is inevitable.
That's life, Greta! That's the way it is for people, unlike Greta, who have to live within a budget. You can't always get what you want, as that old Rolling Stones song goes.
Of course, that's not what Greta wants to hear or attempt to understand. She lives in the land of victims or the corner of promoting herself. Greta knows that the media loves a young woman who blames everything in her culture. What does a shortage of teachers or lousy classrooms have to do with French culture? I don't know, but it sounds good in this age of quick fame and X posts.
So, here's one for Greta to think about: get a life like a real person. Maybe you'll be happier if you stop going from cause to cause to seek happiness.
PS: Check out my blog for posts, podcasts, and videos.