The NY Times is OK with an anti-Catholic ad BUT....

A few days ago, The NY Times ran an ad calling on readers to leave the Catholic Church.  

It was all about the phony message that The Catholic Church wants to deny US women their "right" to buy birth control.

We repeat:  US women are free to have abortions, buy birth control and do whatever they want to do with their lives.

The issue is religious freedom.  In other words, Catholic hospitals and charities should not be required by BO-Care to provide birth control or abortion counseling.

Want birth control pills or abortion counseling?  Call Nancy Pelosi's office.  She will gladly tell where to go. 

A couple of days ago, an organization contacted The NY Times about running an ad calling on moderate Muslims to denounce the radical elements.

The NY Times refused to run the ad.  The NY Times' explanation is ridiculous.  They don't want to put our troops at risk.

The NY Times has a very funny way of of showing concern about the safety of US soldiers in Afghanistan.

The is the same NY Times that did not hesitate to print back in 2005 that we were listening to terrorists' phone calls OR publish WikiLeaks and place many people in danger.

There is something very wrong at The NY Times.    

Check out our conversation with Bill Katz of Urgent Agenda:

Listen to internet radio with Silvio Canto Jr on Blog Talk Radio

---

Tags: The NY Times is OK with an anti-Catholic BUT....  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

Remember the "good war"? Pres Obama was never serious about Afghanistan

During the Bush presidency, the Dems used Afghanistan to attack the Iraq War. 

We were told that Afghanistan was the place to fight, the source of 9-11 and the war worth fighting. We know now that they were just "words", or calculated remarks intended to attack Pres Bush and promote the idea that the Dems were not soft against terrorism.

Ollie North remembers what candidate BO said before the "yes we can" screamers of 2008:

"Four years ago, when then-Sen. Barack Obama was campaigning for president, he said of Afghanistan: This is "a war that we have to win." 

He also claimed, "The Afghan people must know that our commitment to their future is enduring because the security of Afghanistan and the United States is shared.""

He also said that he'd close GITMO, change the Bush anti-terror policies, cut the debt in half and fight for immigration reform!

We can say this:  Pres BO was never really serious about Afghanistan.  It was an election sound bite.

We are now in a horrible situation in Afghanistan.  Our troops are being killed by Afghan security guards.  The Afghan street is no better than before.  We are spending millions and getting no respect from Pres Karsai. (Read his statement)

Last, but not least, Pres BO never explained to the American people what our mission was, or the reason for staying in.

It's time to change our strategy from a heavy "foot print" to attacking & killing terrorists.  

Afghan nation building is not worth another life or dollar.  The Afghans are not capable of appreciating the sacrifice that we've made for them.  Check out our conversation with Bill Katz of Urgent Agenda:

Listen to internet radio with Silvio Canto Jr on Blog Talk Radio

---

Tags: Remember the "good war"?  Pres Obama was never serious about Afghanistan To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!