Monday, November 14, 2011

We don't mind a little love as long as Dallas beats the crap out of Buffalo!

What did the Cowboys eat for breakfast?  I hope that Coach Garrett offers that cook a lifetime contract.

The 5-4 Cowboys are suddenly just a game behind the 6-3 NY Giants in the the NFC East.

Dallas destroyed Buffalo on Sunday.  Frankly, I did not see that one coming because the Bills are playing well in a division that includes New England and the NY Jets.

Nevertheless, the Cowboys showed up to play and put up some rather historic numbers. such as a score of 44-7.

Dallas has two big games coming up.  They need to beat Washington and Miami on Thanksgiving Day.  They have to win these two so that the 2 remaining games with the NY Giants can decide the division.

Let's hope that yesterday's team shows up for the next two games.

P.S. By the way, we've hearing all week about David Nelson, a young man from North Texas who is playing for Buffalo.  Yesterday, Nelson scored a TD and then handed the ball to a Cowboys' cheerleader. It turns out that David Nelson and Kelsi are "dating" and he decided to show a little "love".

OK.  We don't mind!  Show her a little love as long as Dallas wins! 

P.S.  You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.  If you like our posts, drop a dime here.
 

Iran: Why do so many refuse to see the threat?

A few days ago, The Washington Post published an editorial that was very critical of the West and its unwillingness to tackle the Iranian problem:

"THE INTERNATIONAL Atomic Energy Agency has now spelled out in detail what governments around the world have known for a long time:
 
Iran’s nuclear program has an explicit military dimension, aimed at producing a warhead that can be fitted onto one of the country’s medium-range missiles. 

In a 14-page annex to its latest report, the agency summarizes the evidence behind its conclusion that “Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device.” It also says that these programs “may still be ongoing” — a contradiction of the U.S. intelligence community’s controversial conclusion that they were suspended in 2003."  (Wash Post)

So here we are: Nobody wants a war but nobody wants a nuclear Iran either.  At the same time, the Obama administration is learning that putting together a coalition is very difficult.  For example, China and Russia did not want to release this report because they have huge economic ties with Iran.

Will we do nothing?  Will we wait for a coalition?  Or will we act before Israel does it and pushes us into a war?

In the 1930's, no one paid attention to Hitler.  We know how that one ended up.

Today, no one is paying attention to Iran.  How will that one turn out? 

P.S. We spoke to Bill Katz of Urgent Agenda about Iran, Israel and the threat of military action:


Listen to internet radio with Silvio Canto Jr on Blog Talk Radio

Tags: Iran and nuclear plans  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

Pres BO votes "present" on the pipeline (and jobs)


President BO has been talking a lot about "jobs" lately.  Do you remember "pass my bill now"? 

Why is Pres BO killing jobs by postponing the pipeline bringing US$15-a-barrel Canadian oil to American refineries.

What is the point of delaying this until after the election?  Can  someone explain that?

The Las Vegas Review Journal has a great editorial about this:

"The $7 billion, 1,700-mile Keystone XL project, proposed by Calgary-based TransCanada, would carry oil derived from Alberta tar sands to refineries in Texas.

It's a private project. Unlike solar and wind farm boondoggles, no federal subsidy would have been sought. Much of the pipe is already sitting in warehouses. It would be hard to envision a more "shovel-ready" project -- nor one better suited to reduce America's dependence on far more expensive oil imported from hostile foreign lands."

I guess that Pres BO does not want to upset the environmentalists, or another one of the many groups who voted for "change" and have gotten little.

The editorial goes on:

"Terry O'Sullivan, general president of the Laborers' International Union of North America, noted: "The administration chose to support environmentalists over jobs -- job-killers win, American workers lose."

Frankly, it's hard to believe that Pres BO really cares abut jobs.

P.S. We spoke about this with Bill Katz of Urgent Agenda:


Listen to internet radio with Silvio Canto Jr on Blog Talk Radio


Tags: President Obama votes present on the pipeline and the jobs it will create  To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

Search This Blog