It’s hard to believe that this is still going on.
Click to read:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/01/the_state_of_war_is_back_in_cuba.html
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." - President Ronald Reagan
It’s hard to believe that this is still going on.
Click to read:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/01/the_state_of_war_is_back_in_cuba.html

If you live in the Dallas-Ft Worth area, or the Metroplex, as we call it, you are constantly talking about LBJ. It's LBJ to the airport or to Garland or now to I-30 thanks to all of the expansion. Of course, this LBJ, or I-635, is a highway that connects the area from east to west. For the record, we also have a Bush highway farther north. That one was named after our 41st president.
Today, I'm going to remember the other LBJ, or President Lyndon Johnson, the 36th president of the U.S., who died on this day in 1973. He was living in South Texas and watching as his successor announced the end of the Vietnam War:
On the day of Nixon's second inaugural celebration, Johnson watched sullenly as Nixon announced the dismantling of many of Johnson's Great Society social programs and, the next day, that he had achieved the ceasefire in Vietnam that had eluded Johnson.
The following day, while Lady Bird and their daughters were in Austin, Johnson suffered a fatal heart attack at his ranch in Johnson City.
I would argue that few modern Democrats even know who LBJ is. If they do, they rarely talk about him. They are more likely to talk about Beto O'Rourke taking your AR-15 or Senator Bernie Sanders promoting whatever he is promoting.
LBJ's presidency was volatile. It began on the day that President Kennedy was killed in Dallas in 1963. A year later, he won a landslide victory against Senator Goldwater by avoiding the topic of Vietnam and promising not to send troops. By mid-1966, the U.S. involvement in Vietnam had grown to 500,000 troops, and resentment of LBJ's policies divided the Democrats and the nation. By the spring of 1968, President Johnson's fortunes hit bottom, and he did not seek re-election. A week later, Reverend Martin Luther King was killed. Two months later, Senator Robert F. Kennedy was killed, too. That's a lot of history in such a short period.
It is true that LBJ is remembered for the Great Society and significant civil rights reforms. His knowledge of the U.S. Senate and Congress, and persistence, brought many reluctant Southern Democrat legislators along. However, the jury is still out on the billions of dollars spent on the War on Poverty. In other words, did we just throw money at the problem rather than deal with other causes of poverty? I would argue that we threw money at the problems and may have made the breakdown of the family inevitable.
Overall, it was a tragic presidency, and the first one that I remember, having arrived here with my parents in 1964. A few years ago, there was a great book, Master of the Senate, written about LBJ, by Robert A. Caro. It reminded us that he was a strong U.S. Senate majority leader, a better legislator than an executive.
I'll be on LBJ later this week and remember that it was named after the president born in Texas, who died 50 years ago, and the same Democrat whom no one remembers around here.

We recall today another anniversary of Roe v Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in the U.S. Before the Roe v Wade opinion, abortion was a state matter or an issue settled by voters, not un-elected judges.
My opposition to abortion, or Roe v Wade, is based on two factors;
1) Abortion is the taking of a human life. What else is it? Why does any woman have an abortion anyway? (Of course, I'm not talking about those isolated and rare cases where the mother's life is in jeopardy)
2) Abortion is a state issue. I think that voters, and legislatures, should decide whether or not abortion is legal in their jurisdictions.
Last, but not least, Roe v Wade has "poisoned" our judicial appointments. We've turned every Supreme Court nomination into a battle over Roe v Wade.
We pray that Roe v Wade is overturned. We will be a better country without legal abortions.
P.S. You can listen to my show. If you like our posts, please look for ”Donate” on the right column of the blog page.
The week in review with Bill Katz, the editor of Urgent Agenda. Trump in Davos plus Greenland. One year of Trump # 2. Minnesota, ICE and fraud.....plus other stories......
Listen to "The week in review with Bill Katz, the editor of Urgent Agenda" on Spreaker.What do you get when you mix bad policies and a beautiful climate? You get California!
Click to read:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/01/we_gotta_get_out_of_this_place.html
"Although the game seemed decided, the Cowboys refused to give up.
On their next drive, Dallas drove 89 yards in 8 plays to score on Staubach's 7-yard touchdown pass to Dupree.
Then after Dallas' Dennis Thurman recovered an onside kick at 2:19, Drew Pearson caught 2 passes for gains of 22 and 25 yards as the Cowboys drove 52 yards in 9 plays to score on Staubach's 4-yard touchdown pass to Butch Johnson.
With the ensuing extra point, the score was cut to 35–31 with just 0:22 left in the game.
But the Cowboys' second onside kick attempt was unsuccessful.
Bleier recovered the ball and the Steelers were able to run out the clock to win the game."
This is all about intimidating people for their support of ICE, an agency legally and properly enforcing immigration laws. Invading a church is the just latest example of the suicidal mission that these protestors are on, from “defunding ICE” to now interrupting a church service to remind the audience that their pastor supports or wants laws respected. It’s insane, but these people are insane.
Click to read:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/01/get_me_to_the_church_on_time.html
Watching political developments in Mexico takes you to two points. On one hand, the political class is playing the sovereignty card, i.e. no foreign intervention. On the other hand, my unscientific survey of Mexican acquaintances, suggests that Mexicans want something done about they call "organized crime." The "politicos" are talking ideology and the people are screaming that they shot their mayor again.
Click to read:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/01/the_great_divide_south_of_the_border.html
Watching political developments in Mexico takes you to two points. On one hand, the political class is playing the sovereignty card, i.e. no foreign intervention. On the other hand, my unscientific survey of Mexican acquaintances, suggests that Mexicans want something done about they call "organized crime." The "politicos" are talking ideology and the people are screaming that they shot their mayor again.
So where are we? It appears that the Trump administration is sending signals that more needs to be done. This is the story:
The United States is intensifying pressure on Mexico to allow U.S. military forces to conduct joint operations to dismantle fentanyl labs inside the country, the New York Times reported on Thursday, citing U.S. officials.
U.S. officials want American forces, either Special Operations troops or CIA officers, to accompany Mexican soldiers on raids on suspected fentanyl labs, the report said, citing multiple unnamed officials.
"On the campaign trail, President Trump pledged to take on the cartels," a White House official told Reuters, adding that Trump has "left all options on the table" to stop drugs from entering the country.
U.S. President Donald Trump told Fox News last week that cartels were running Mexico and suggested the U.S. could strike land targets to combat them, in one of a series of threats to deploy U.S. military force against drug cartels.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said this week that she ruled out a U.S. military intervention to combat drug cartels following a "good conversation" with Trump on security and drug trafficking.
My guess is that most Mexicans are beyond the word games, i.e. foreign intervention and sovereignty. They want action and they don't see it. Why not? Well, that's where the debate gets angry and very partisan. The opposition claims that Presidenta Sheinbaum is in the pocket of cartels and her administration responds by saying that U.S. troops would be counterproductive.
I agree that send the Marines would create more problems. It would be difficult to bomb fentanyl plants without killing civilians, for example. However, joint operations with Mexican troops taking the lead is a better idea. The U.S. could simply direct and supply them, but it's the Mexicans who break down doors and pull bad guys out of the place.
So the debate goes on and the phone calls do too. In the end, I believe that Mexicans know what this violence is doing to them, their communities, and even business opportunities. They want action, not more ideology about sovereignty.
Who will prevail? Stay tuned. The great divide is widening.
P.S. Check out my blog for posts, podcasts and videos.


P.S. You can listen to my show. If you like our posts, please look for ”Donate” on the right column of the blog page.
"No Che Day" with Dr. Carlos Eire, Humberto Fontova & students at Towson University.....

We remember Bobby Goldsboro who was born in Florida on this day in 1941. “On June 19, 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court rules against Curt Flood in Flood v. Kuhn, denying Flood free agency as a baseball player. Flood was trying to break the reserve clause that had tied baseball players to one franchise since the establishment of professional baseball.”
What we need this time is for the players' union to save the game from a few owners who want to win the World Series at any cost.
Click to read:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/01/are_you_ready_to_hear_damm_dodgers.html

