In other words, what happens when their pet project doesn't lower premiums or their favorite peacemaker is about to start another war without going to Congress?
The answer is that they write more and more editorials about Cuba. Yes, our lovely island is now the obsession of a few writers at The NY Times.
The latest one is as irrational as the previous ones.
First, they called for lifting the embargo last month even though they admitted that Cuba is a police state. Why reward a police state by opening access to US credit lines? We are still waiting for an answer.
Second, they called for trading Mr Gross, a US citizen, for "3 of the Cuban 5" convicted spies. They admitted in this editorial that there was no reason to hold him in prison. So why aren't we asking for his unconditional release? Why trade convicted spies for someone unjustly imprisoned by a dictatorship?
Now, they want Cuban doctors around the world to put freedom aside and do the regime's work:
"Many medical professionals, like a growing number of Cubans, will continue to want to move to the United States in search of new opportunities, and they have every right to do so. But inviting them to defect while on overseas tours is going too far."I guess that the "Cuba experts" in the newspaper believe that Cuban doctors choose to go overseas and do the regime's propaganda. Has it occurred to any of the "Castro apologists" that doctors don't choose to go to Venezuela or Africa? They are sent there by the regime!
Again, The NY Times editorials want Cubans to do the dictator's bidding and put their desire to be free aside. What are they putting in the water at the paper's editorial offices?
Tags: New York Times and Cuba To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!