As expected, the "in the tank for Obama NY Times" published an article attacking Mitt Romney's business career.
Here is an example of the article:
"From 1984 to 1999, Romney and his deputies made fortunes by investing in, acquiring and then selling about 150 companies.
It was high-stakes work that shaped Romney's values and views, taught him the art of salesmanship and negotiation and took him deep inside the boardrooms and factories of U.S. business." (NYTimes)
Why has The NY Times suddenly discovered that Mitt Romney was a successful businessman who made millions honestly?
First, he beats or ties Pres BO in all of the national polls.
Secondly, he was a millionaire who did not "bundle" money for Obama's campaign.
As we've learned in Solyndra, and others, Obama loves millionaires as long as they are contributing to his campaign.
Obama also takes care of his "money bundlers" with federal loan guarantees and other contracts. Ed Morrissey has a good summary of some of the post-Solyndra stories:
"Senior officials have taken unusual steps to secure the contract for New York-based Siga Technologies Inc., whose controlling shareholder is billionaire Ronald O. Perelman, one of the world’s richest men and a longtime Democratic Party donor."
Is The NY Times covering that Solyndra story?
We spoke about this with Mike Sage, radio host and Romney supporter, and Frank Burke, businessman and contributor to American Thinker, about this story:
Listen to internet radio with Silvio Canto Jr on Blog Talk Radio
Tags: New York Times vs Romney To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!