Salena Zito had an interesting observation:
"Obama took to pointing fingers when his poll numbers started to slip last fall.
So far, he has blamed the stagnant economy on ATMs, ditches, Slurpees, corporate-jet owners, the Tea Party, Republicans, Japan’s earthquake, the Arab Spring, the Arab Summer, George Bush, and “fat-cat” Wall Street something-or-others.
The kitchen sink may be next.
His numbers are tumbling in the critical battleground states of Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida, North Carolina and New Hampshire – states he must win in 2012.
RealClearPolitics crunched the numbers based on the electoral-college vote: Total from states giving Obama 51 percent or higher approval, 166; from states at 49 percent or lower, 320.
A presidential candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win."
Why isn't blaming everybody working for Pres BO?
First, he's been president for 31 months.
Second, he passed his own stimulus and promised major results.
Third, and most important, the voters want leadership not finger pointing.
It does not matter whether he did nor did not inherit a mess. What matters today is that he has ideas to turn things around.
So far he does not have a clue and that's why "blaming Bush" does not work anymore!
Check out our Sunday night chat with Bill Katz of Urgent Agenda:
Listen to internet radio with Silvio Canto Jr on Blog Talk Radio
Tags: Pres Obama's bad bad polls To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!
