First, it was Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post. She couldn't take it anymore and called on Pres BO to do something. She called it "Obama's 'Where's Waldo' Presidency"!
We posted earlier this week about Paul Krugman of The "madly in love with Obama" New York Times. He called it The President Is Missing.
Marcus, and specially Krugman, checked their common sense at the door and fell for BO like teen girls at a Jonas Brothers concert.
It was pathetic to watch how journalists turned into cheerleaders for a presidential candidate in 2008.
Let's add Richard Cohen to the growing list of "BO's groupies" who are trying to get their reputation back.
This is Mr Cohen today:
"Now, though, it is past time to move on and lead.
Slogans such as "win the future" are rhetorical cotton candy.
They melt in your mouth and leave nothing behind. The president needs to say explicitly what he wants and how he's going to get there.
"Change" won't do anymore.
It's leadership we need."
I'm happy that Marcus, Krugman and Cohen are finally calling on Pres BO to get specific and stop doing "the hope and change" shuffle.
Why don't they also apologize to their readers for surrendering their journalistic integrity when they became part of "BO's groupies" in 2008?
Tags: Obama and the liberals To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!
