What about this thing called "BO Care"?
Let's start with Prof Samuelson's description of BO-Care:
'It's hard to know whether President Obama's health care "reform" is naive, hypocritical or simply dishonest.
Probably all three.
The president keeps saying it's imperative to control runaway health spending.
He's right.
The trouble is that what's being promoted as health care "reform" almost certainly won't suppress spending and, quite probably, will do the opposite."
Does any one really believe that turning health care over to the federal government will reduce costs?
How many "yes we can" screamers believe that nonsense?
Again, governing is harder than campaigning.
"The White House is caught in a battle within its own party over how to finance a comprehensive overhaul of America's health-care system, as key Democrats advocate a tax plan that could require President Obama to break his campaign pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class."
We saw this situation in 1993, the last time we had a Dem president with a congressional majority.
The Dems are for health care until they have to release the details!
What should we do?
First, keep our health care in private hands, doctors and hospitals.
Second, give citizens a tax credit to purchase private insurance policies.
Third, provide "cards" to those under the poverty line.
Let the federal government guarantee access but keep the industry under private control.
P.S. Check out Romney on health care:
No comments:
Post a Comment