Pres BO looks "small" by going after FOX News

Let's say it again.

Pres BO has never had an executive job.

He was never a mayor, governor or an agency department head.

He never ran anything!

The presidency is BO's first managerial position!

In other words, BO is not used to criticism.

As an Illinois state senator, BO avoided controversy and voted present over a hundred times.

As a US Senator, he spent most of his time promoting a book or running for president.

BO has never been in a position where he had to make decisions.

As a candidate, he was never challenged on promises like getting out of Iraq or closing GITMO or giving 95% of us a tax cut.

His slogans went unchallenged.

Today, BO faces the reality of the presidency.

Presidents make decisions not give speeches!

Presidents have to say "yes or no"! They can't vote "present"!

Now comes FOX News.

As O'Reilly demonstrates in the video, the Pew Research Group gave FOX good marks for covering the McCain-Obama election.

Did FOX help McCain? The answer is no. The numbers don't support that!

At the same time, how do you explain the pro-Obama tilt at CNN and MSNBC?

I watch FOX News.

I see a steady stream of "Rep vs Dems" debates!

What do we call Susan Estrich? Juan Williams? Allan Colmes? Dr Mark Hill?

Aren't these well known liberals?

Why is FOX News killing the others in ratings?

Could it be that viewers like what they see? the debates? the actual debates over Pres BO's ideas?

It's true that Sean Hannity is anti-Obama. However, he has an opinion show, just like Keith Obermann has a liberal show at MSNBC.

You can't call Greta's "On the record" liberal or conservative.

She always has a mix of guests and discussion.

O'Reilly is the toughest interview on TV. This is why he kills everybody else in the ratings.

You can not go on O'Reilly and avoid questions or engage in spin!

Again, the public loves it and the ratings are all going on FOX's direction!

Frankly, I see a lot of journalism at FOX News.

The public agrees and the audience proves it!

Beyond numbers, what does Pres BO expect?

Shouldn't we have a network that actually challenges the governing class?

David Zurawik, a TV critic for The Baltimore Sun, has a word for the media in the tank for BO:

"“I hesitate to write these words, but good for Fox.

It must be doing something right, if it has the President complaining about the tiny bit of scrutiny he gets on TV.” (Baltimore Sun Critic Praises Fox News For Giving Obama the 'Tiny Bit of Scrutiny' He Faces On TV )

And there is more.

The Obama Infatuation By Robert Samuelson is on target:

"The Obama infatuation is a great unreported story of our time.

Has any recent president basked in so much favorable media coverage?

Well, maybe John Kennedy for a moment; but no president since.

On the whole, this is not healthy for America."

It's not healthy at all!

By the way, ask candidate Hillary Clinton about the media being in the tank for BO?

Hillary Clinton's campaign was the biggest victim of a media determined to carry the water for candidate BO!

Back to the present.

Pres BO is proposing massive and radical changes across the board.

Can't we count to 10 and have a debate?

Do we have to rush everything?

Remember the stimulus? How well did "rushing" that one through work out?

Pres BO looks silly when he singles out a media group.

P.S. Bill O'Reilly responded to Pres BO this week:

And "The Special Report" round table also discussed it:

That's right! This is embarrassing. Wonder what the deans of journalism schools are saying about this?